There is nothing "wrong" with it as such!
It is just a matter of opinion.
Prescott cores are excessively power hungry as well as being hot-runners.
60-65°C while idling??? (2.8/3.0/3.2 GHz on PPGA478 and PLGA775 confirmed) , no thanks.
Intel hit the roof with their Netburst technology introducing the Prescott core.
But that is OK , they abandoned Netburst eventually and released their "Core" CPU's - now , these processors I do like.
Just to point out one fact - Intel CPU's are the ONLY ones I ever wanna have in any of my PC's (past and current opinion!).
As such I don't want to make Intel bad , they just went off tracks with the Prescott's - especially the first ones for PPGA478.
Edit:
taikucingg - try
Log in to see links to check Your components temperatures , voltages and fan speeds.
HWMonitor seems to be quite accurate.
It will also estimate a laptops battery charge/health.
With
Log in to see links You can identify Your PC's CPU.
HWMonitor.JPG
HWMonitorHP.JPG
Gallery Moderator
Member
I was only wondering, that was a long explanation.
Originally Posted by Wilhelm
Log in to see links
Reply With Quote